Skales vs Cursor.
Desktop agent vs AI code editor.
Cursor lives inside your editor. Skales lives on your desktop. Both use AI to write code. They serve different workflows.
The core distinction
Cursor is built for the seat between your keyboard and your code: inline edits, repo-aware chat, and multi-file refactors inside a VS Code-style editor. Skales sits one layer out. It runs as a desktop agent whose coding capability (Codework) is one tool among many, sitting beside email triage, document drafting, image generation, and scheduled tasks.
If your work is mostly inside a codebase and you want deep editor integration, Cursor is the stronger fit. If you want one local agent that handles coding plus everything else a desktop assistant can reasonably do, Skales is the stronger fit.
Side by side
A fair comparison of where each tool fits.
Scope: whole desktop vs code editor
Skales
Skales is a desktop agent. It reads files across your computer, drafts emails, runs Browser Playbooks, creates images and documents, and ships a coding agent (Codework) as one capability among many.
Cursor
Cursor is an AI-first fork of VS Code. It excels inside a codebase: inline edits, chat with your repo, multi-file refactors. Outside the editor, it does not do anything.
Local vs cloud processing
Skales
Runs on your machine. Use Ollama for fully offline operation. Files and context stay local. When you use cloud model APIs, prompts go directly to the provider under their policy, not through Skales.
Cursor
Sends code context to its own backend and to the model provider. Even with Privacy Mode, requests transit Cursor infrastructure. Offline operation is not supported.
Cost structure
Skales
Free for personal use. BYOK at direct provider cost, or use Ollama for zero ongoing cost. No subscription. No per-seat pricing.
Cursor
Free tier is limited. Pro is $20/month. Business is $40/month per user. Power users can exceed the included requests and pay extra or slow down.
Privacy and data handling
Skales
Data never leaves your machine with Ollama. Conversations, memory, and files are stored locally. You control retention entirely.
Cursor
Opt-in Privacy Mode reduces retention but does not eliminate transit. Default settings allow code to contribute to improving the service.
Model flexibility
Skales
Connect OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Mistral, Groq, or local Ollama models. Swap mid-project. One agent, many models.
Cursor
Offers a curated set of models behind its own routing. Good defaults, but the model menu is bounded by what Cursor exposes.
Coding workflow
Skales
Codework reads your project, plans changes, shows a live diff, and applies with your approval. It runs alongside everything else the agent does, not inside an IDE.
Cursor
Inline completions and Composer-style multi-file edits inside the editor. Deeply integrated with the editing surface you already use.
Quick comparison
| Feature | Skales | Cursor |
|---|---|---|
| Primary surface | Desktop agent | Code editor |
| Runs locally | Yes (Ollama supported) | Partial (cloud routing) |
| Coding agent | Codework, with diff preview | Composer and inline edits |
| Non-coding tasks | Email, docs, images, scheduled tasks | Out of scope |
| Price | Free + API costs | $20-$40/user/month |
| Model flexibility | BYOK, many providers, Ollama | Curated model set |
When to use each
Choose Skales when you need:
- ✓ A local agent for coding plus non-coding work
- ✓ Offline operation via Ollama
- ✓ Freedom to choose any model provider
- ✓ Scheduled, background automations
- ✓ No per-seat subscription
Cursor may suit you better for:
- ✓ Heavy daily time inside a codebase
- ✓ Multi-file refactors inside the editor
- ✓ Inline completions and Composer flows
- ✓ VS Code ecosystem and extensions
- ✓ Individual developer productivity focus
Try the desktop agent approach
Free for personal use. Windows, macOS, and Linux. No account required.
Also compare: Skales vs ChatGPT · Skales vs Copilot · Local vs Cloud AI